Disabled Person Pay A Ransom Inspite Being Exempted From Fasting
Date:
Channel: Zakir Naik
File Size: 0.74MB
Episode Notes
Dr Zakir Naik – Why Should A Disabled Person Pay A Ransom Inspite Of Being Exempted From Fasting_
Related
- Murtaza Khan – The True Light Of Islam By
- Moutasem al-Hameedy – Secrets of the Heart – EP 13
- Omar Suleiman – Why Me #02 Why Did Allah Choose This Time For Me
- Zakir Naik – Do you Endorse Saddam Hussain, Mujahideen and Palestinian Suicide Bombers
- Karim Abuzaid – Response to Yajuj Majuj don’t exist as is traditionally believed
- Yasir Qadhi – A Casual Discussion
- Taimiyyah Zubair – Taleem al-Quran 2010 – Juz 05 – L064D
AI Generated Transcript ©
Next point, if you like regarding the situation of a disabled person, why is it a disabled person has to pay a ransom due to the fact they haven't fasted? Unless isn't the Quran in surah baqarah chapter number two, what's the modality for that, if it is difficult for a person to fast, you can either fast appear and that is feeding of an indigent person or a poor person. The reason is, that if a person is disabled, or if you think permanently, and there are no signs that he will become healthy, where he can observe fast. So the question of him compensating
the question for him to keep the fast later on doesn't arise at all. So that is the reason for him. There is a ransom that he has to pay something that is equivalent to feeding an indigent person or feed indigent person for every fast that he has missed.